PIP: The Reasonable Wishes Of A Claimant To Walk Further Or More Frequently Must Be Considered

Same Difference

A new legal judgment established that the PIP mobility component should not be based on a supposed “objective test” of how far a disabled person or how often they need to “move around”.

View summary of decision

In brief, the Upper Tribunal judgment holds that it is wrong for a tribunal to assume that a disabled person will only reasonably need to walk once to the local shop and back.

Instead, it needs to consider if they have a reasonable wish to be able to go elsewhere – to the park or to visit a friend for example.

If they are prevented from doing this by the effects of their disability, then this needs to be considered in how far and how often they can repeatedly mobilise. 

In CPIP/3622/2016 Upper Tribunal Judge Gray holds that to the extent a tribunal excluded the appellant’s choice as to…

View original post 384 more words


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s